Top Menu Top Menu Top Menu Top Menu Top Menu Top Menu
Mark House Mark House
Springfield, IL
Joined: 05/30/2011
View Profile
The Beatle Who Vanished Facebook Twitter

On Demand
Play or Download
The Brunch
News
All Beatles News
Articles
Scoops & Spins
Tour Info. Events
After Brunch
Behind The Brunch
PHOTOGRAPHs
Pics N' Publicity
Live Chat
With BBC Buds
& Celebrities
Downloads
MORE Vids & Auds
Old Brown Shows
Trivia Contest
Fun & Prizes
My Baby’s Request
HOT LINE
Fab Forum
BBC Dialogue
Beatles News
Paul & ATV Settle on Songs 7/1/2017
billboard.com
McCartney sued in January, asking the court for a declaration that he could soon reclaim his copyright ownership share to the iconic group´s catalog of songs. Because the Copyright Act of 1976 lengthened the term of copyright protection by 19 years, it created for owners of works who signed over their rights on or before Jan. 1, 1978 the non-waivable right to reclaim them after a certain period of time. The provision McCartney relied on here states specifically: "Termination of the grant may be effected at any time during a period of five years beginning at the end of fifty-six years from the date copyright was originally secured, or beginning on January 1, 1978, whichever is later."

For Sir Paul, that date was Oct. 5, 2018. Despite not receiving any pushback from Sony/ATV after sending termination notices, the artist was on alert because one of the company´s affiliates successfully opposed Duran Duran´s efforts to regain rights. In December, an English court ruled that the interpretation of contracts under English law trumps American termination law and the band´s agreement transferred the "entire copyrights" for the "full term" of the copyrights and "implicitly precludes the Group Members from exercising rights under US law which have the result that the Claimant´s ownership of the copyrights is brought to an end prior to their expiry."

Now that Paul McCartney and Sony/ATV have resolved this issue themselves, copyright watchers won´t have the satisfaction of knowing how a stateside court would rule in this case.

"The parties have resolved this matter by entering into a confidential settlement agreement and jointly request that the Court enter the enclosed proposed order dismissing the above-referenced action without prejudice," writes McCartney attorney Michael Jacobs in a Thursday letter to U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos. The details of the deal are unclear, but the order specifies that the New York federal court will "enforce the terms of the parties’ Settlement Agreement, should a dispute arise."

View All News Articles

tumblr visitor